Win, re Miller v. Robinson: I think Robinson is quicker, and it is clear to me that we misused him. We played him like we are playing Dixon now. Kind of a short yardage back. But that isn't what he does well. He's a good blocker (though he's no Vonte Leach) and can catch the ball pretty well, but he isn't a particularly good running back. I'd take Miller because a. like Kevin said, he's younger without being worse in any measurable way in any area, and b. he's got a lot more upside. He's only played a couple of years and has not been used as a running back hardly at all. I suspect that in a couple years he will have some running back skills, and he will be better as a receiver, too.