Jack, when Michaels and Collingsworth started talking about how often Rodgers takes a sack, and how that was related to how few interceptions he threw and how few turnovers the Packers committed, I thought of Alex Smith. Smith is no Rodgers - yet - and I'm not trying to re-ignite that argument, but this aspect of their play is similar. And it's a good reminder that sacks don't necessarily mean sh*t if the team taking the sack isn't turning the ball over. So yeah, it will be great if we can sack Rodgers all day long next week, but I think it will be more important to win the turnover contest. If my memory serves me, that has historically been the difference when we have played the Canaries over the last 15 years.